Thanks. I was getting to that, but hadn't started :-) Per our discussion off-list, I agree with this method, and the patch looks fine to me.
//Magnus > -----Original Message----- > From: Claudio Natoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:07 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [PATCHES] APC/socket fix (final?) > > > > For application to HEAD. > > This should take care of most, if not all, cases where a > backend can be interrupted in a blocking socket operation by > a signal which itself performs a socket operation (which > interacts badly with our APC-based signal implementation). > > --- > Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from > Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see > <a > href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html";>http://www.me > metrics.com/em > ailpolicy.html</a> > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
