Thanks. I was getting to that, but hadn't started :-)

Per our discussion off-list, I agree with this method, and the patch
looks fine to me.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claudio Natoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:07 AM
> Subject: [PATCHES] APC/socket fix (final?)
> For application to HEAD.
> This should take care of most, if not all, cases where a 
> backend can be interrupted in a blocking socket operation by 
> a signal which itself performs a socket operation (which 
> interacts badly with our APC-based signal implementation).
> --- 
> Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from 
> Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 
> <a 
> href="";>
> ailpolicy.html</a>

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to