> > (1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
> >     Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions
> I thought Peter didn't like it.

He asked 'why' I needed it. I answered his question.
He may or may not agree, I don't know!

> Would you repost and we can review it again.


> > (2) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
> >     Subject: [PATCHES] 'information_schema' considered a system schema
> I don't remember that one at all.  Would you repost?


> Basically, what happens on these patches is if someone says there is a
> problem, and you reply but it isn't clear that the problem is refuted or
> addressed,

That's what I do, but I can only "argue", not "refute" or "address"
issues. Whether it is refuted or addressed is in the head of the decider.

Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to