> > (1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST) > > Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions > > I thought Peter didn't like it.
He asked 'why' I needed it. I answered his question. He may or may not agree, I don't know! > Would you repost and we can review it again. Ok. > > (2) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:35:57 +0200 (CEST) > > Subject: [PATCHES] 'information_schema' considered a system schema > > I don't remember that one at all. Would you repost? Ok. > Basically, what happens on these patches is if someone says there is a > problem, and you reply but it isn't clear that the problem is refuted or > addressed, That's what I do, but I can only "argue", not "refute" or "address" issues. Whether it is refuted or addressed is in the head of the decider. -- Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
