Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Montag, 10. Mai 2004 09:17 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
>> It appears that Dann Corbit has filed a MinGW bug on this, with accurate
>> problem description, but he received a less than stellar response. See
>> func=detail&aid=931263&group_id=2435&atid=102435

> I added a followup to this bug and he requests a minimal reproduceable 
> example.  Can someone provide one?

>From what we've been hearing, all you have to do is download current
Postgres (snapshot tarball or CVS pull) and try "configure" a few times
(with "make distclean" to clean up).  That's perhaps not minimal but it
should at least convince him the bug exists ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to