Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ouch. How long has that documentation been wrong? We have > > > pointed folks to that section of the docs tons of times, and no > > > one mentioned that "logrotate" is really "rotatelogs", and that > > > it is missing parameters? > > > > > > I have applied the following patch to document rotatelogs > > > properly. > > > > I think you just broke it. logrotate and rotatelogs are two > > different programs, and AFAIK the existing documentation correctly > > described the one that is easier to use with Postgres. > > Oh, why don't I have logrotate. My system has: > > rotatelogs - rotate Apache logs without having to kill the > server > > rotatelogs logfile rotationtime [offset] > > and it says it is Apache's. I must be wrong but can someone explain > this?
logrotate rotates log files and hups the servers according to a configuration file. rotatelogs reads the log data on stdin and reopens a new output file once in a while. The first hunk of your patch was wrong, the rest seemed OK. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match