Andreas Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joe Conway wrote: >> 2) This allocation size was a bit ambigous and I think based on a once >> longer tablespace directory name:
> This size calculation originated (copy/paste) from > commands/tablespace.c, Yeah --- Bruce did not adjust the string length calculations when he editorialized on the directory name. I'd been meaning to go back and make them match. > should be clarified there too (and "pg_tblspc" is > hardcoded in strings, could be extracted to a macro definition). [ shrug... ] The name is not going to change again. I have never cared for the practice of writing strlen("foo") as if it were a compile-time constant. But certainly it would be entirely pointless to define such a macro and then use it in only one place. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings