Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, the README file integrated those comments as appropiate.
Oh...
> Apparently the embed-new-files-in-patch business was not a good idea
> after all. Sorry for not being clear on the message.
Yeah. I can deal with 'cvs diff' stuff but it wasn't at all clear that
this patch was adding files. Could you send me just the README (off
list)?
> Oh, I was wondering whether it would be a good idea to move tqual.c
> to access/transam. I think it's weird in utils/time, and do we really
> want a directory for just one file that's even badly placed according
> to the comments on the file itself?
It's not worth the loss of CVS history to move it ... and I'm not sure
that access/transam is a better place anyway.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
