"Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That might work for you, but it's not portable.

> Do you consider pg_tm.tm_gmtoff reliable and portable from 
> pg_localtime(&now)?

Yeah, in fact I was just adapting the patch to use that.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to