"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That does seem to work, yes. I thought there was some magic reason we
> were using PG_BINARY_W and not "w".. Assuming there isn't, attached
> patch is certainly cleaner.
Looks reasonable to me. Patch applied.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
