On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:09:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is the LockObject patch I was able to come up with.  It's almost
> > the same patch that Rod Taylor published two years ago; basically, it
> > expands LOCKTAG with a ClassId attribute, and provides a LockObject
> > method to allow locking arbitrary objects.
> I wonder whether it wouldn't be possible to clean up the "XactLockTable"
> kluge with this --- ie, instead of denoting transaction locks by a
> special relation ID, denote them by a special class ID.  That might just
> move the kluginess from one place to another, but it's worth thinking about.

How about locking the special class InvalidOid?  We don't use that ATM

Anything else would require having a special relation registered, which
is where we are now ...

Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
"La rebeldía es la virtud original del hombre" (Arthur Schopenhauer)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to