Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:09:31PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Here is the LockObject patch I was able to come up with. It's almost > > > the same patch that Rod Taylor published two years ago; basically, it > > > expands LOCKTAG with a ClassId attribute, and provides a LockObject > > > method to allow locking arbitrary objects. > > > > I wonder whether it wouldn't be possible to clean up the "XactLockTable" > > kluge with this --- ie, instead of denoting transaction locks by a > > special relation ID, denote them by a special class ID. That might just > > move the kluginess from one place to another, but it's worth thinking about. > > How about locking the special class InvalidOid? We don't use that ATM > AFAICS.
When we roll over OID's do we make sure we never return InvalidOid? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
