On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> I preferred Simon's idea of not trying to produce a warning for pages
> when we've detected relation overflow.

Sounds good.  I'll make that update.

Should the relation overflow be a WARNING or a LOG?  It sounds like
if you have that problem it's almost certainly a problem, right?

> Making it a LOG rather than WARNING does address the issue of being
> too much in-your-face for an uncertain condition, though.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to