On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 19:44 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Main issue is the need to poke the xlog record pointer with a new value
> after the log switch. I'm a little uncertain about that approach and I'm
> very likely getting it wrong now. Better ideas welcome.

Happier with that approach now. Working on other issues in code.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to