On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 19:44 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > Main issue is the need to poke the xlog record pointer with a new value > after the log switch. I'm a little uncertain about that approach and I'm > very likely getting it wrong now. Better ideas welcome.
Happier with that approach now. Working on other issues in code. Best Regards, Simon Riggs ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
