Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > It seems server_read_only is the same as default_transaction_read_only > > except it can't be changed. > > I thought the TODO item was for a low-level read-only option, suitable > for trying to look at a corrupted database or run off a read-only volume. > This is very far from being that --- it allows temp table creation/use, > and it still eats transaction IDs so it is certainly not read-only to > xlog or clog. > > I am not sure I see any use case for this implementation: it is > read-only enough to get in your way, without being read-only enough > to derive any real benefit.
I am not sure I see the use case either but I developed it so everyone could look at it and decide if it is useful. When true, it is basically a unchangable default_transaction_read_only. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
