> But the second is only a subset of the first, no?  So why not just
> implement the first?  Put another way, why do you think the second is
> necessary?

Because there is "default_transaction_read_only" option and

My implementation is an extension of the existing option.

I wanted to make the postmaster read-only, and found
"default_transaction_read_only" option, but it can be overwritten.

OpenSource Development Center,
NTT DATA Corp. http://www.nttdata.co.jp/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to