Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Why is that a good idea? In a complex application it'd be awfully easy >> to break logic that depends on such a thing.
> True, but I think it offers a usefully concise syntax for simpler > applications. Perhaps the documentation should be amended to mention the > potential risks? Like, say, the sequence being deleted before the lastval call? If I thought it was a good idea at all, I'd bother to criticize the patch itself --- it's got some problems. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly