Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Why is that a good idea?  In a complex application it'd be awfully easy
>> to break logic that depends on such a thing.

> True, but I think it offers a usefully concise syntax for simpler 
> applications. Perhaps the documentation should be amended to mention the 
> potential risks?

Like, say, the sequence being deleted before the lastval call?

If I thought it was a good idea at all, I'd bother to criticize the
patch itself --- it's got some problems.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to