Neil Conway wrote:
> Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> > Here is a small patch that implements a function lastval() that
> > works just like currval() except that it give the current
> > value of the last sequence used by nextval().
> What do people think of this idea? (Tom seems opposed, I'm just 
> wondering if there are other opinions out there.)

I like the idea of lastval, though I would rather see us just use
currval() with no argument for it, rather than invent a new function
name.  It does the same as currval('last sequence called') right?

  Bruce Momjian                        |               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to