Neil Conway wrote:
> Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> > Here is a small patch that implements a function lastval() that
> > works just like currval() except that it give the current
> > value of the last sequence used by nextval().
>
> What do people think of this idea? (Tom seems opposed, I'm just
> wondering if there are other opinions out there.)
I like the idea of lastval, though I would rather see us just use
currval() with no argument for it, rather than invent a new function
name. It does the same as currval('last sequence called') right?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
