Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jaime Casanova wrote: >> Or are any reasons to keep that argument?
> None that I can see. I'll apply the patch later today, barring any > objections. Looking at the 7.3 sources, the argument was used to support the then-existing convention that an error message include the name of the reporting routine. This does seem obsolete now. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster