Do we need a TODO item? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > This was the patch that I took the array processing piece from and > attempted to fix, since it was badly broken. However, I'm not happy > about any of the ways of doing it, and suspect I won't get it done for > 8.1. I think we need that piece done before we look at ANYELEMENT/ANYARRAY. > > cheers > > andrew > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >Sergej, are you going to repost this patch? > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > >>Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > >> > >> > >>>Also, I don't think the arg_is_p variable is really the proper fix for > >>>this, but I am unsure what to recomment. Others? > >>> > >>> > >>The thing I didn't like about that was that it assumes there is only > >>one pseudotype behavior that is or ever will be interesting for plperl. > >> > >>I think it'd probably make more sense to store an array of the parameter > >>type OIDs and then check for ANYELEMENT or ANYARRAY as such in the > >>places where the patch uses arg_is_p. > >> > >> regards, tom lane > >> > >>---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > >>TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
