Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > I'm very glad to see this. But is a nicer name possible? To perl > > programmers at least, "substitute" should make sense. > > What is the matter with replace? We already have replace: > > test=> \df replace > List of functions > Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types > ------------+---------+------------------+--------------------- > pg_catalog | replace | text | text, text, text >
I think that regexp_replace is a good name. It is easy to understand. regards, --- Atsushi Ogawa ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org