On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:48 PM, Dave Page wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 June 2005 12:46


<snip />

I have a new idea --- pg_storage_size().


I'm not against that one, but I think Tom's point is vaild. I cannot
think of anything better at the moment though (maybe pg_component_size,
but that's equally random) :-(

Anyone else? Please? Someone? Anyone? :-)

I'm still unclear as to what exactly is trying to be captured by the names, so I'll just throw some out and see if they're intuitive to anyone.

pg_table_extensions_size()
pg_table_support_size()
pg_relation_extensions_size()
pg_relation_support_size()

pg_relation_extended_size()

My two yen... if that :)

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to