You are into the cycle we were in.  We discussed pg_object size (too
vague) and pg_index_size (needs pg_toast_size too, and maybe toast
indexes; too many functions).

Yeah, I read those discussions, and think you were better off then than you are now, which is why I went back to it somewhat.

To be honest, the amount of effort being expended on this naming discussion far outweighs the benefits. Maybe it's time for a core member to step in and just resolve it - one way or the other?


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to