Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When writing this patch it occurred to me that we nuke our
> member-of-role cache for one-off lookups on occation. I don't
> particularly like that, especially when we *know* it's a one-off lookup,
Yeah. What I had been thinking about is that maybe it shouldn't be just
a one-element cache. At the moment though we have no performance data
to justify complicating matters (heck, not even any to prove we need a
cache at all...) It'd be smart to try to profile some realistic cases
before spending any time coding.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
