Tom Lane wrote:
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
I don't know either, but this brings up another question. Stats
wraparound.
We'll all be safely dead, for one thing ;-)
At one update per nanosecond, it'd take approximately 300 years to wrap
a 64-bit counter. Somehow I don't have a problem with the idea that
Postgres would need to be rebooted that often. We'd want to fix the
32-bit nature of XIDs long before 64-bit stats counters get to be a
real-world issue ...
*sigh* Sorry, I should have done a little math before I asked that
question.....
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
