Matt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I can attach a patch that supports [EXACT | NOEXACT].
>> Somehow, proposing two new reserved words instead of one doesn't seem
>> very responsive to my gripe :-(.

> My intention was to introduce the idea that the current behavior should
> be changed, and to then suggest a path that eventually eliminates all
> the new reserved words.

Once you put 'em in, you can't ever really get rid of 'em :-( ... so I'd
prefer to investigate a path that doesn't use that syntax in the first

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to