I don't understand this proposed patch.  Pulling in more headers, when
they aren't needed, shouldn't change the behavior of the code... 
What am I missing?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 4:03 PM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Petr Jelinek; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org;
dpage@vale-housing.co.uk;
> Bruce Momjian; Chuck McDevitt
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
> 
> 
> 
> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> >Petr Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Yep those changes proposed in my previous email fixes IPv4 too.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Apparently not on loris (unless there was another patch that I
missed).
> >Maybe something to do with a different version of Windows?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> I suspected we'd forgotten something.
> 
> The attached small patch appears to be what's required (at least on
> loris).  "make check" failed but not for any apparent ipv6 reason.
More
> importantly, we correctly set HAVE_IPV6 and HAVE_STRUCT_ADDRINFO.
> 
> cheers
> 
> andrew


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to