I don't understand this proposed patch. Pulling in more headers, when they aren't needed, shouldn't change the behavior of the code... What am I missing?
Advertising
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 4:03 PM > To: Tom Lane > Cc: Petr Jelinek; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org; dpage@vale-housing.co.uk; > Bruce Momjian; Chuck McDevitt > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support > > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > >Petr Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >>Yep those changes proposed in my previous email fixes IPv4 too. > >> > >> > > > >Apparently not on loris (unless there was another patch that I missed). > >Maybe something to do with a different version of Windows? > > > > > > > > > > I suspected we'd forgotten something. > > The attached small patch appears to be what's required (at least on > loris). "make check" failed but not for any apparent ipv6 reason. More > importantly, we correctly set HAVE_IPV6 and HAVE_STRUCT_ADDRINFO. > > cheers > > andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
