Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > This has been saved for the 8.2 release: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold > > Uh, why do we need this at all? "NOT (tid = tid)" covers the > functionality already.
tid should be a fully functional type, at least for = and !=. > I disagree strongly with renumbering existing hand-assigned OIDs for > this. There's too much risk of breakage and no benefit. Agreed. > Also, you forgot to add the negator cross-links between the operators. OK. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
