Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Well, then what real options do we have? It seems the patch is just > required for all branches.
I think it would be possible to fix it in a less invasive way by taking and releasing the ControlLock an extra time in SimpleLruReadPage and SimpleLruWritePage. What's indeterminate about that is the performance cost. In situations where there's not a lot of SLRU I/O traffic it's presumably negligible, but in a case like Jim's where there's evidently a *whole* lot of traffic, it might be a killer. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly