I wrote: > Hm. One of the main problems I found was incorrect results for > LONGLONG_MIN (-2^63). I'm rather tempted to add a test case for > that to the int8 regression test and see if any platforms fail ;-)
Done ... let me know whether the back branches still pass regression for you ;-) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster