I wrote:
> Hm.  One of the main problems I found was incorrect results for
> LONGLONG_MIN (-2^63).  I'm rather tempted to add a test case for
> that to the int8 regression test and see if any platforms fail ;-)

Done ... let me know whether the back branches still pass regression
for you ;-)

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to