On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 09:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We discussed an optimization of VACUUM here
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-09/msg00046.php
> > that would allow VACUUM to complete faster by avoiding scanning the
> > indexes when no rows were removed from the heap by the VACUUM.


> Unfortunately I can't read that message right now because archives
> isn't responding, but this seems like a pretty bad idea to me.
> You still have to do the vacuum cleanup pass (at least in the btree
> case, and the only reason gist doesn't need it is it's not yet up
> to speed) so there's no real savings.
>                       regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to