Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe the attached patch does this now.  Under my test case it
> correctly handled things.  I'm certainly happier with it this way and
> apologize for not realizing this better approach sooner.  Please
> comment.

Applied (with trivial stylistic changes) as far back as 8.0, which
was the first release that would try to continue after an error.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to