Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's an updated patch with help from Simon. Once I get a test system
> going again in the lab I'll start posting some data. I'm planning a
> combination of block sizes (BLCKSZ and XLOG_BLCKSZ) and number of WAL
> buffers.
If there's no objection, I'll go ahead and apply the parts of this that
create a separate XLOG_BLCKSZ symbol, but not (yet) the parts that
actually change any parameter values. I can't see any very good reason
why data block size and xlog block size were ever tied together, and I
think it'll make the code read better if they're separated.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
