On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 19:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Here's an updated patch with help from Simon. Once I get a test system > > going again in the lab I'll start posting some data. I'm planning a > > combination of block sizes (BLCKSZ and XLOG_BLCKSZ) and number of WAL > > buffers. > > Applied with minor corrections (you missed pg_resetxlog, for one).
Thanks. (That omission was mine, not Mark's.) On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 18:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I can't see any very good reason > why data block size and xlog block size were ever tied together, and I > think it'll make the code read better if they're separated. I see you've changed the control file back from XLOG_BLCKSZ to BLCKSZ; I wasn't sure which one of those to choose. Perhaps that also should be changed to PGCONTROL_BLCKSZ to more clearly differentiate that also (but not put it in pg_config_manual.h? Best Regards, Simon Riggs ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly