Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <> writes:
> > The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
> > a log message that it was skipped.
> I still can't get excited about this.  Who will it help?  The DBA who is
> silly enough to think his ancient SSL library supports CRL is probably
> also silly enough not to read the postmaster log carefully.  It would
> make a whole lot more sense just to document that OpenSSL < whatever
> doesn't support CRL.

Why hard-code something if we can dynamically report it, and NetBSD 2.0
isn't that old.

  Bruce Momjian

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to