On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 01:11:26PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > This is a pretty massive patch, but I understand the license concerns. > Is this what we want to do?
More than half the patch is simply moving the OpenSSL related stuff from fe/be-secure.c to fe/be-secure-openssl.c. If you create the -openssl versions first you can more easily see that the changes are in fact quite minor. Unfortunatly diff can't represent the change "copy N lines from file A to file B" very efficiently. If you like I can split it into two patches, one patch splits the openssl stuff out of the main files and a second which adds gnutls support. > FYI, yesterday's SSL CRL additions need to be added to this patch. I saw them. I've already added them to my local version, including the corresponding changes for GnuTLS. I was going to wait a few days before sending a new version, in case any more changes came down the line. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
Description: Digital signature