On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 02:47:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > If you like I can split it into two patches, one patch splits the openssl > > stuff out of the main files and a second which adds gnutls support. > > Yes, I understood that, but we now have duplicate files for secure > connections, meaning we have double maintenance in some cases.
Hmm, I see your point. I guess that's an unavoidable side-effect of the process :(. However, judging from the CVS logs, these have not been files with a high change rate. I think it's worth it but I can imagine other people see that differently. There is not a lot of code can be shared. What can be already is eg. prepare_for_client_read and client_read_ended, the names of the files used, EPIPE handling, etc. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
Description: Digital signature