On Wednesday 31 May 2006 13:24, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:14:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Is it worth adding a module name to the magic block, or should we just
> > leave well enough alone?  It's certainly not something foreseen as part
> > of the purpose of that block.  In the absence of some fairly concrete
> > ideas what to do with it, I'm probably going to vote keep-it-simple.
> I actually considered it while writing the patch but decided against
> given the general tendancy against putting extra info into the modules
> in general...
> Personally I think it's a good idea, except: where is this info going
> to be displayed or used?

Marko's suggestion on producing a list of installed modules comes to mind, and 
I suspect tools like pgadmin or ppa will want to be able to show this 

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to