Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Perhaps "why is the buildfarm failing" would be appropriate.
> Yes, that is appropriate, though it seems Neil's cleanup of the patch > has fixed it now. I see only a single stats failure and an initdb > failure in the buildfarm, neither of which I assume are related to the > patch. Nah, it was a false alarm: I was looking at the first post-patch report, http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mongoose&dt=2006-07-02%2003:30:01 but apparently mongoose had managed to pick up a partially-updated snapshot. The later reports (including mongoose's own next try an hour later) were all OK. Sorry for the noise. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
