Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Perhaps "why is the buildfarm failing" would be appropriate.
> 
> > Yes, that is appropriate, though it seems Neil's cleanup of the patch
> > has fixed it now.  I see only a single stats failure and an initdb
> > failure in the buildfarm, neither of which I assume are related to the
> > patch.
> 
> Nah, it was a false alarm: I was looking at the first post-patch report,
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mongoose&dt=2006-07-02%2003:30:01
> but apparently mongoose had managed to pick up a partially-updated
> snapshot.  The later reports (including mongoose's own next try an
> hour later) were all OK.
> 
> Sorry for the noise.

Thanks for keeping an eye on that buildfarm.  I often forget to look
myself.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to