Tom Lane wrote:
Here's what I've got so far.  I think there's probably more gold to be
mined in terms of reducing runtime memory consumption (I don't like the
list_free_deep bit, we should use a context), but functionally it seems
complete.  I'm off to dinner again, it's in your court to look over some
more if you want.

(PS: if you want to apply, go ahead, don't forget catversion bump.)

Committed, with catversion bump.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to