Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a close call. On balance I'd be inclined to accept the patch if it 
> reviews OK, even though we will throw the code away soon (we hope).

Well, the patch seems pretty ugly code-wise as well.  I'd be willing to
clean it up if I thought it wouldn't ultimately get yanked out again,
but I'm not sure that I see the point if we think it's a dead end.

It doesn't come close to applying to CVS HEAD, either :-(

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to