Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera írta:
> >Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> >
> >  
> >>>I think at this point is someone else's judgement whether you can put it
> >>>back or not.  Tom already said that he doesn't object to the feature per
> >>>se; no one else seems opposed to the feature per se, in fact.
> >>>
> >>>Now, I don't really see _how_ to do it in nice code, so no, I don't have
> >>>any suggestion for you.  You may want to give the pumpkin to Tom so that
> >>>he gives the patch the finishing touches (hopefully making it support
> >>>the "COPY view" feature as well).
> >>>
> >>>If it were up to me, I'd just commit it as is (feature-wise -- more
> >>>thorough review is still needed) and revisit the COPY view stuff in 8.3
> >>>if there is demand.
> >>>      
> >>OK, I will put it back as it was in v8
> >>keeping all your other cleanup and
> >>let Bruce and Tom decide.
> >
> >Hum, are you going to put back the original cruft to support copy view?
> >I suggest you don't do that.
> Well, the other way around is to teach heap_open()
> to use views. Brrr. Would it be any cleaner?

Certainly not.

Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to