Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Wait a minute.  What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
>>> commands sent with \g use a cursor.

> I am confused.  I assume \g and ; should be affected, like Peter says. 
> Tom, what *every* command are you talking about?  You mean \d?

Like I said, I thought we were intending to modify \g's behavior only;
that was certainly the implication of the discussion of "\gc".

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to