Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, the patch only multiplies by 30, so the interval would have to > > span +5 million years to overflow. I don't see any reason to add > > rounding until we get an actual query that needs it > > Have you tried your patch against the various cases that have been > discussed in the past? In particular there were several distinct > examples of this behavior posted at the beginning of the thread, and > I'd not assume that a fix for one handles them all.
Yes, it fixes all posted examples, except one that displays 23:60. I cannot reproduce that failure from Powerpc so am waiting for Michael to test it. > BTW, while trolling for examples I came across this: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-10/msg00307.php > pointing out some issues that still haven't been addressed. Yea, that is a bunch of issues. They are already on the TODO list. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
