Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes
> into "operator families", as per discussion last week.  It's far from
> ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments.  What's done
> is ...

> Comments?

Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress
would be more visible?

  Gregory Stark

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to