Bill Moran wrote:
In response to "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Bill Moran wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
+               if (trace_temp_files != -1)

Might be more robust to say

    if (trace_temp_files >= 0)
Because it would allow for the easy addition of more negative numbers
with magic value?
because ISTM any negative number here should mean no action is to be
taken. Otherwise how else is it different from 0?


I specified in the GUC config that minimum allowable value is -1.

OK, missed that, sorry. Please return to normal viewing ...



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to