Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>   bool
> ! isort(int4 *a, int len)
>   {
>   bool
> ! isort(int4 *a, const int len)
>   {

If VC thinks that that is required to fix a warning, it's too broken to live.
AFAICS what you've got there is a compiler that is being pedantically
strict about language details that it does not actually understand well;
its apparent idea that "const **" means "const * const *" being much in
the same line as this one.

I don't mind the non-const-related parts of this patch, but I recommend
rejecting all the const-decoration changes.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to