Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have two runs of DBT-2, one with the patch and one without.
> 
> > Patched:
> 
> > autovac "public.stock" scans:1 pages:1285990(-0) 
> > tuples:25303056(-2671265) CPU 95.22s/38.02u sec elapsed 10351.17 sec
> 
> > Unpatched:
> 
> > autovac "public.stock" scans:1 pages:1284504(-0) 
> > tuples:25001369(-1973760) CPU 86.55s/34.70u sec elapsed 9628.13 sec
> 
> So that makes this patch a good idea why?  (Maybe what we need to see
> is the impact on the total elapsed time for the DBT-2 test, rather
> than just the VACUUM runtime.)

Yea, in summary, it looks like the patch made the performance worse.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to