Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > I ran two 24h test runs with DBT-2, one with the patch and one without. > To get comparable, predictable results, I turned autovacuum off and run > a manual vacuum in a loop on the stock-table alone. > > As expected, the steady-state of the stock table is smaller with the > patch. But only by ~2%, that's slightly less than I expected. > > But what surprises me is that response times went up a with the patch. I > don't know why.
Maybe because of increased contention of ProcArrayLock? (I assume you are using that, althought I haven't seen the patch) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
