Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>I think the patch is ready. Please remove the PHANTOMCID_DEBUG define 
> >>and ifdef blocks before applying.
> >
> >BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's
> >nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk.
> >Can anyone think of a better name?  The best I can do offhand is
> >"merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring. 
> MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different beasts...

Dual cid?  Double cid?

Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to