Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 20:32 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
>> -x:  Generate extended detail in the latency log, including a timestamp 
>> for each transaction

> I wonder if it's worth just making this the default.

Does this have any impact on the reported results (by slowing pg_bench
itself)?  If not, then doing it always would be OK, but I'm not
convinced about that ...

> Feature additions are usually severely frowned up in stable release
> branches, but the standard for contrib/ changes is lower,

No, it isn't.  This is *not* a candidate for back-porting.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to