Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 20:32 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
>> -x: Generate extended detail in the latency log, including a timestamp
>> for each transaction
> I wonder if it's worth just making this the default.
Does this have any impact on the reported results (by slowing pg_bench
itself)? If not, then doing it always would be OK, but I'm not
convinced about that ...
> Feature additions are usually severely frowned up in stable release
> branches, but the standard for contrib/ changes is lower,
No, it isn't. This is *not* a candidate for back-porting.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
